CHICAGO, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: NJM EXTERIORS PLLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NJM EXTERIORS PLLC in 5349 N. CANFIELD AVE, CHICAGO, IL 60656 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347106643.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NJM EXTERIORS PLLC
- Site address
- 5349 N. CANFIELD AVE
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60656
- Mailing
- 2646 S. SPAULDING AVE, 1ST FLOOR, CHICAGO, IL 60623
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about November 14, 2023, employees were exposed to eye injury while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection during roofing work. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1339.5
- · Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about November 14, 2023, employees performing roofing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet. b) On or about November 14, 2023, employees were exposed to falls of approximately 11 feet while working around unprotected skylights. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2350
- · Z (S) $4688
1926.502 D06 I
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): A snaphook not designed for such use was engaged directly to webbing, rope or wire rope: a) On November 14, 2023, employees were using a personal fall arrest lifeline that had its locking snaphook incorrectly connected to webbing. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: a) On or about November 14, 2023, the front nylon straps of body harnesses were used as attachment points for fall protection on pitched roof surfaces. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) On or about November 14, 2023, employees were using portable extension ladders which did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing being accessed. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1674.5
- · Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347106643.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.