Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RED & GREEN SHIELD HOLIDAY LIGHTING SOLUTIONS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RED & GREEN SHIELD HOLIDAY LIGHTING SOLUTIONS in 878 SHORE ROAD, CAPE ELIZABETH, ME 04107 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 347126039.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RED & Green Shield Holiday Lighting Solutions — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RED & Green Shield Holiday Lighting Solutions is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
878 SHORE ROAD
City
CAPE ELIZABETH
State
ME
ZIP
04107
Mailing
985 PORTLAND RD SUITE 101, SACO, ME 04072
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,452 · Current $3,425 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   Roofs Of Buildings At Multiple Locations - During the month of November employees engaged in the installation of Christmas lights on roofs were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3424.75
  • — Z (S) $6452

1910.30 A03

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(3): The employer did not train each employee in at least the following topics: The nature of the fall hazards in the work area and how to recognize them; the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards; the correct procedures for installing, inspecting, operating, maintaining, and disassembling the personal fall protection systems that the employee uses; and the correct use of personal fall protection systems and equipment specified in paragraph:   Establishment - The employer did not ensure that each employee working on roof(s) installing holiday lighting, who were exposed to fall hazards, were trained on the nature of the fall hazards in the work area; how to recognize fall hazards in the work area; the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards; and the correct use of personal fall protection systems and equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.67 C02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,452 · Current $3,422 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that only trained person(s) operated an aerial lift:  Establishment - The aerial lift operator was not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of aerial lift being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize associated hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3421.75
  • — Z (S) $6452

1910.67 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A personal fall arrest or travel restraint system that meets the requirements of Subpart I of this part was not worn, or attached to the boom or basket, when working from an aerial lift:   Customer Site(s) - During the month of November the employer did not ensure that employee(s) who operated, or worked in, an aerial lift wore fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $783 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): A log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300-A), and the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms were not kept by the establishment:  Establishment - The employer did not maintain OSHA forms 300, 300A, 301, or equivalent, for the year 2023.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $783

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): Walking-working surfaces were not maintained in a safe condition:  878 Shore Road Cape Elizabeth -  Two non-self-supporting ladders utilized by employee(s) to install holiday lights on customers roofs were not maintained in a safe condition in that they were erected at angle(s) that did not meet the manufacturer design and manufacturer warning label(s) affixed to the ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347126039.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.