Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TL STEEL LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TL STEEL LLC in 7021 SOUTH PRAIRIE LAKE ROAD, BURRTON, KS 67020 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 347142549.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch TL Steel LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TL Steel LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TL STEEL LLC
Site address
7021 SOUTH PRAIRIE LAKE ROAD
City
BURRTON
State
KS
ZIP
67020
Mailing
7021 SOUTH PRAIRIE LAKE ROAD, BURRTON, KS 67020
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Abate by
Feb 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,687 · Current $2,812 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3): Point of operation guard were not provided:   At the shop area, employees are exposed to hazards in that the machine guarding was not provided for the Magnetic Milwaukee  drill press to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by rotating parts, and/or and/or flying chips.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2812.2
  • — Z (S) $4687

1910.252 B02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Abate by
Feb 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.252(b)(2)(i)(A):Helmets or hand shields were not used during all arc welding or arc cutting operations:  At the shop, employee engaged in welding activities is exposed to infrared and ultraviolet rays emitted by the welding arc in that did not utilized a welding helmet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3750
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.252(b)(2)(iii):Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields  At the welding area, non-welder employees such as but not limited to: foreman(s), forklift drivers  were exposed to radiant energy or light radiation when passing nearby welding activities. Welding screens or other protective measures were not provided to protect nearby or adjacent employees when employees are welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3750
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Abate by
Feb 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(2)(i):Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  At the shop area, employee(s) performing welding activities while voluntary using a half-face respirator are exposed to health hazards. The employer did not determine if the voluntary use of a respirator did not in itself create a hazard before the employee used the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  At the shop, employees engaged in forklift activities are exposed to struck-by hazards in that they have not completed a written test, practical test nor been evaluated prior to operating a forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(6):The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  At the shop, employees engaged in forklift activities are exposed to struck-by hazards in that they have not been certified for forklift operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  At the shop, employees were exposing to struck by hazards in that forklifts had operation issues:  1) The Clark CS500 Unit #121 forklift had an inoperable horn. 2) The Toyota Mitsubishi Unit #16 forklift had an inoperable light, backup audio alarm and horn. 3) The Kalmar AC  forklift had an inoperable horn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View TL Steel LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347142549.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.