Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MURPHY MACHINE PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MURPHY MACHINE PRODUCTS, INC. in 935 LIVELY BOULEVARD, WOOD DALE, IL 60191 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 347151052.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Murphy Machine Products, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Murphy Machine Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
935 LIVELY BOULEVARD
City
WOOD DALE
State
IL
ZIP
60191
Mailing
935 LIVELY BOULEVARD, WOOD DALE, IL 60191
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
58
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 350 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2024
Abate by
May 17, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,524 · Current $5,762 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.242(b):Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  a) On or about December 7, 2023 an employee was observed cleaning inside the  CNC Automatic Lathe Type SR-20J II type B Serial no:472 (29)  with an air gun set with 110 p.s.i without a pressure release nozzle.  b) On or about December 7, 2023 an employee was observed cleaning inside the Takisawa TC-10 Machine no.TLRT9554 with an air gun set with 110 p.s.i. without a pressure release nozzle.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5762
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.132 F01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 350 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2024
Abate by
May 17, 2024
Penalty
Initial $13,828 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(f)(1): The employer shall provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE. Each such employee shall be trained to know at least the following: When PPE is necessary; What PPE is necessary; How to properly don, doff, adjust, and wear PPE; The limitations of the PPE; and, The proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE.   On or about December 7, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees were adequately trained on the requirement and limitations of personal protective equipment.  Employees who were observed using chemicals such as Perkote 30-348 and BS-55 without using any hand protection did not know they were required to use it when doing so.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $13828

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 350 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2024
Abate by
May 17, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $6,914
29 CFR  1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  a) On or about  December 7, 2023 , the employer did not ensure that employees used appropriate hand protection while cleaning  with  Perkote 30-348 exposing employees to aspiration hazards and skin irritation.   b) On or about December 7, 2023 , the employer did not ensure that employees used appropriate hand protection, thereby exposing employees  to health hazards associated with hazardous chemicals likely to result in injury such as use of BS-55 causes severe skin burns to the hands.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6914
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 350 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2024
Abate by
May 17, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,218 · Current $4,609 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):  Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:   a) On or about December 7, 2023, the employer did not ensure that a container with Perkote 30-348 was labeled with the product identifier thereby exposing employees to skin irritation and aspiration hazards.   b) On or about December 7, 2023, the employer did not ensure that a secondary container with Meyer BS-55 was labeled with the product identifier thereby exposing employees to skin burns and eye damage.   c) On or about December 7, 2023, the employer did not ensure that a container with Perkote 30-348 was labeled with the product identifier thereby exposing employees to skin irritation and aspiration hazards.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4609
  • — Z (S) $9218

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2024
Abate by
May 17, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work areas at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) On or about December 7, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided effective training on hazardous chemicals in the workplace.  Employees using Perkote 30-348 were not familiar with the hazards associated with the chemical and the methods to protect them from skin irritation and aspiration hazards.   b) On or about December 7, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided effective training on hazardous chemicals in the workplace. Employees using Meyer BS-55 were not familiar with the hazards associated with the chemical and the methods to protect them from skin burns and eye damage.   Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347151052.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.