Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: METHODS MACHINE TOOLS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METHODS MACHINE TOOLS, INC. in 65 UNION AVENUE, SUDBURY, MA 01776 (NAICS 333517). OSHA activity number 347155285.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Methods Machine Tools, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Methods Machine Tools, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
65 UNION AVENUE
City
SUDBURY
State
MA
ZIP
01776
Mailing
65 UNION AVENUE, SUDBURY, MA 01776
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333517
Employees
115
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,218 · Current $9,218
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The spraying operations (except electrostatic spraying operations) were not designed, installed and maintained such that the average air velocity over the open face of the booth (or booth cross section during spraying operations) was not less than 100 linear feet per minute. Electrostatic spraying was conducted when the air velocity over the open face of the booth was less than 60 linear feet per minute (or more, depending on the volume of the finishing material being applied and its flammability and explosion characteristics). Visible gauges or audible alarm or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or ensure that the required air velocity was maintained. Filter rolls were not inspected to insure proper replacement of filter media.   Location - Spray booth:  On or about 12/8/23, the employer utilized a spray booth that was not properly maintained as the pressure differential gauge was inoperative and air filters were not inspected and replaced as they were observed clogged with a substantial amount of spray finishing materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9218
  • — Z (S) $9218

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,524 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(9):  A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction.  Location - Spray booth:  On or about 12/8/23, combustible waste liquid was stored within three (3) feet of a spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,913 · Current $6,913
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):   A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  On or about 12/8/23, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program when respirators were required to be used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6913
  • — Z (S) $6913

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form.  Location - Paint booth:  On or about 12/8/23, the employer did not evaluate the workplace for respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators.  Location - Paint booth:  On or about 12/8/23, the employer did not train employees who were required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,913 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  On or about 12/8/23, the employer did not obtain medical evaluations for employees prior to requiring the use of respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6913

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):  The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph.  Location - Paint booth:  On or about 12/8/23, the employer did not conduct fit testing for employees required to use tight-fitting respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,524 · Current $11,524
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):   One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  A).  Location - Horizontal band saw: On or about 12/8/23, the unused portion of the blade on an Amada horizontal band saw was not guarded.         B).  Location - Shear: On or about 12/8/23, pinch point hazards on the hold down mechanisms on a Cincinnati shear were not guarded.    C).  Location - Press brake:  On or about 12/8/23, point of operation hazards on a Chicago press brake were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11524
  • — Z (S) $11524

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,218 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.253(b)(4)(iii):  Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one half-hour.  On or about 12/8/23, oxygen and fuel gas cylinders were stored together while not in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9218

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 30, 2024
Abate by
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $9,218 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):  Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.    On or about 12/8/23, extension cords were used on a permanent basis to provide power to production equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9218

View Methods Machine Tools, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347155285.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.