Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: L.B. HALL ENTERPRISES, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of L.B. HALL ENTERPRISES, INC. in 17300 HALSTED ST., HOMEWOOD, IL 60430 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 347156911.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch L.B. Hall Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for L.B. Hall Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
17300 HALSTED ST.
City
HOMEWOOD
State
IL
ZIP
60430
Mailing
6126 FACTORY ROAD, CRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60014
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2024
Abate by
Apr 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $5,531 · Current $3,872 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about December 11, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer had not ensured that each employee required to wear 3M 6300 half-face reusable respiratory protection had been provided with a medical evaluation.  b) On or about December 11, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer had not ensured that each employee required to wear 3M 8210 N95 respiratory protection had been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3871.7
  • — Z (S) $5531

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2024
Abate by
Apr 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) On or about  December 11, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were required to wear tight-fitting facepiece respirators.   The employer did not ensure employees were provided with a fit test prior to the initial use of the respirator(s), thereby exposing employees to the hazards including, but not limited to, respirable silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2024
Abate by
Apr 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1):  The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  a) On or about December 11, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were provided with and required to wear 3M 6300 half-face reusable respiratory protection for exposure to materials including respirable silica dust.  The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the required training elements of the standard including, but not limited to, why respiratory protection is necessary, factors that compromise protection, proper fit, proper use, limitations and capabilities, change schedules, emergency use, inspection, maintenance and/or storage, general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms.  b) On or about December 11, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were provided with and required to wear 3M 8210 N95 respiratory protection for exposure to materials including respirable silica dust.  The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the required training elements of the standard including, but not limited to, why respiratory protection is necessary, factors that compromise protection, proper fit, proper use, limitations and capabilities, change schedules, emergency use, inspection, maintenance and/or storage, general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View L.B. Hall Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347156911.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.