NEW BERLIN, WI —
OSHA Inspection: FELSS ROTAFORM LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FELSS ROTAFORM LLC in 5160 SOUTH EMMER DRIVE, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 347163420.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FELSS ROTAFORM LLC
- Site address
- 5160 SOUTH EMMER DRIVE
- City
- NEW BERLIN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53151
- Mailing
- 5160 SOUTH EMMER DRIVE, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331210
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,857 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: (a) On or about December 7, 2023, employees attempting to clear a jam and maintenance employees attempting to trouble shoot the MN 192 machining center were exposed to crushing hazards, and the employer did not ensure the machine was properly locked out prior to commencement of work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6857
1910.147 F03 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,857 · Current $4,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): A procedure was not utilized to afford the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device when servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, (a) On or about December 7, 2023, employees attempting to clear a jam and maintenance employees attempting to trouble shoot the MN 192 machining center were exposed to crushing hazards and the employer did not ensure procedures were utilized to afford each the employees the same level of protection as personal lockout/tagout.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4100
- — Z (S) $6857
1910.147 F03 II C
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(C): When more than one crew, craft, department, etc. is involved, assignment of overall job-associated lockout or tagout control responsibility to an authorized employee designated to coordinate affected work forces and ensure continuity of protection. (a) On or about December 7, 2023, employees attempting to clear a jam and maintenance employees attempting to trouble shoot the MN 192 machining center were exposed to crushing hazards and the employer did not ensure assignment of overall job-associated lockout or tagout control responsibility to an authorized employee designated to coordinate affected work forces and ensure continuity of protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: (a) On or about December 7, 2023, employees attempting to clear a jam and maintenance employees attempting to trouble shoot the MN 192 machining center were exposed to crushing hazards and the employer did not ensure authorized employee affixed a personal lockout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,857 · Current $3,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) On or about December 14, 2023, employees working on and around the Bailleigh Hydraulic Press (Model No. HSP-176M-HD and Serial No. 1810173) were exposed to crushing and amputation hazards and the employer did not ensure the point of operation was properly guarded. (b) On or about December 14, 2023 employees working on and around the Sunex Tool Hydraulic Press (Model No.525OEP) were exposed to crushing and amputation hazards and the employer did not ensure the point of operation was properly guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3400
- — Z (S) $6857
More inspections at Felss Rotaform LLC
View Felss Rotaform LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331210)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347163420.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.