HOSCHTON, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: NFG FRAMING LLC
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of NFG FRAMING LLC in LOT 2538 TWIN LAKES SUBDIVISION, HOSCHTON, GA 30548 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347166498.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NFG FRAMING LLC
- Site address
- LOT 2538 TWIN LAKES SUBDIVISION
- City
- HOSCHTON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30548
- Mailing
- 9619 CENTRAL DRIVE, MINT HILL, NC 28227
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,607 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. a) At Lot #2538: On 12/14/2023, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees operating these tools at 120 PSI.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1607.4
- · Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,607 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) At Lot #2538: On 12/14/2023, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 10-feet 5-inches to the lower level, in that employees were not provided with a fall protection system while finishing engaged in framing activities on the second level and top plates.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1607.4
- · Z (S) $2679
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347166498.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.