Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL WALL SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COASTAL WALL SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, LLC in 369 MANGROVE SHADE CIR., APOLLO BEACH, FL 33572 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 347174989.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Wall Systems of Florida, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Wall Systems of Florida, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
369 MANGROVE SHADE CIR.
City
APOLLO BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33572
Mailing
1211 TECH BLVD., TAMPA, FL 33619
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $7,813 · Current $5,469 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards, in that hard hats were not utilized by employees while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5469.1
  • — Z (S) $7813

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,938 · Current $7,657 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that fully planked working platform levels were not utilized by employees while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7656.6
  • — Z (S) $10938

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that walkways between scaffolds were not at least 18 inches wide while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that a scaffold with greater than a 4:1 base to height ratio was not restrained from tipping while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that mud sills were not installed while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that a safe access point was not installed for employees while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Abate by
Jan 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that a competent person did not perform an inspection before performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that fall protection was not used while performing siding work at heights greater than 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2024
Abate by
Jan 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,938 · Current $7,657 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   a) On a supported scaffold at a residence, located at 369 Mangrove Shade Cr.: On or about 12/20/23, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the employees were not trained on how to recognize and minimize fall hazards before performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7656.6
  • — Z (S) $10938

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347174989.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.