MERIDEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: APPLE HEALTH CARE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of APPLE HEALTH CARE, INC. in 33 CONE AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 347196719.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- APPLE HEALTH CARE, INC.
- Site address
- 33 CONE AVENUE
- City
- MERIDEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06450
- Mailing
- 33 CONE AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06450
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 122
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E02 I
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,913 · Current $3,457 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(2)(i): The employer did not identify a physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) to perform medical evaluations using a medical questionnaire or an initial medical examination that obtained the same information as the medical questionnaire: Establishment: On or about January 3, 2024, the employer did not ensure the licensed practical nurse was medically evaluated by a licensed professional before the worker used the respirator when providing care to a COVID-19 positive patient.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3456.5
- — Z (S) $6913
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,218 · Current $4,609 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Establishment: On or about January 3, 2024, the employer did not ensure the licensed practical nurse was fit tested for the N95 respirator before the worker used the respirator when providing care to a COVID-19 positive patient.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4609
- — Z (S) $9218
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,218 · Current $4,609 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in sections (i)-(vii): Establishment: On or about January 3, 2024, the employer did not ensure the licensed practical nurse was provided respirator use training including respirator capabilities, malfunctions, inspection, maintenance, and other topics before the worker was required to use the respirator when providing care to a COVID-19 positive patient.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4609
- — Z (S) $9218
1904.32 B02 I
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,304 · Current $1,152 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(2)(i): Total numbers of the columns on OSHA 300 Log did not match total numbers on the Annual Summary: Establishment: On or about February 1, 2024, the employer did not total the columns on the OSHA 300 Log and write them on the Form 300A Annual Summary.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1152
- — Z (O) $2304
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347196719.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.