HOSCHTON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: BENJAMIN GUTIERREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BENJAMIN GUTIERREZ in 425 CHATUGE DR, LOT 561 CROSSWIND SUBDIVISION, HOSCHTON, GA 30548 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347219156.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BENJAMIN GUTIERREZ
- Site address
- 425 CHATUGE DR, LOT 561 CROSSWIND SUBDIVISION
- City
- HOSCHTON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30548
- Mailing
- 657 MOUNT ZION RD APT A7, JONESBORO, GA 30236
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a) Lot 561, On or about January 18, 2024, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees while operating Bostitch and Pneutools nail guns at 200 PSI while engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2074
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) Lot 561, On or about January 18, 2024, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards at heights of approximately 9-feet and 22-feet to the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347219156.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.