JONESBORO, AR —
OSHA Inspection: CONTROLTEK, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CONTROLTEK, INC. in 3505 AIRPORT ROAD, JONESBORO, AR 72401 (NAICS 335314). OSHA activity number 347226854.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONTROLTEK, INC.
- Site address
- 3505 AIRPORT ROAD
- City
- JONESBORO
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72401
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 17006, JONESBORO, AR 72403
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335314
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,904 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: a) On or about January 15, 2024, employees performing electrical work on an energized busbar system were not qualified to work on energized equipment. b) On or about January 15, 2024, employees assigned fire watch duties were provided fire extinguishers. The employees did not have fire extinguisher training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7904.4
- — Z (S) $11292
1926.97 C02 VIII
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $5,647 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.97(c)(2)(viii): Electrical protective equipment was not subjected to periodic electrical tests. Test voltages and the maximum intervals between tests were not in accordance with Table E-4 and Table E-5: On or about January 15, 2024, employees were performing electrical work on an energized busbar system using rubber gloves without having electrical tests in the last six months.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5646.9
- — Z (S) $8067
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,904 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): The employer permitted employees to work in close proximity to energized, unguarded, and ungrounded electric power circuits that the employee could contact in the course of their work: On or about January 15, 2024, employees performed electrical work such as but not limited to removing busplugs from an energized busbar system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7904.4
- — Z (S) $11292
1926.416 A03
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,904 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): The employer began work without determining if employees could contact any part of an energized circuit and did not post warning signs and advise employees of the location of the circuit, hazards, and protective measures they need to take: On or about January 15, 2024, employees performed electrical work on energized busbar system. Warning signs were not posted, and employees were not advised of the protective measures that need to be taken.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7904.4
- — Z (S) $11292
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,904 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact: On or about January 15, 2024, employees were performing electrical work on an energized busbar system without electrical protective equipment, in that: a) Employees were not wearing appropriate electrical protective equipment on the torso. b) Employee were not wearing electrical protective equipment on the lower extremities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7904.4
- — Z (S) $11292
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about January 15, 2024, employees were performing electrical work on an energized busbar system without electrical protective equipment for their eyes and face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
More inspections at Controltek, INC.
View Controltek, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335314)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347226854.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.