ROGERS, AR —
OSHA Inspection: ACTIONPAQ CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ACTIONPAQ CORPORATION in 2120 TOWN WEST DRIVE, ROGERS, AR 72756 (NAICS 333993). OSHA activity number 347233918.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ACTIONPAQ CORPORATION
- Site address
- 2120 TOWN WEST DRIVE
- City
- ROGERS
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72756
- Mailing
- 2120 TOWN WEST DRIVE, ROGERS, AR 72756
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333993
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $5,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about January 25, 2024, inside of the machine shop area, the employer did not develop a respiratory protection program for employees that were required to wear 3M 6200 half-face respirators with NIOSH 6001 organic vapor cartridges while performing welding tasks.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $5700
- — C (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about January 25, 2024, in the machine shop, employees welding on stainless steel parts were provided and required to wear 3M 6200 half-face respirators with NIOSH 6001 organic vapor cartridges. Employees had not been given a medical evaluation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about January 25, 2024, in the machine shop, employees welding on stainless steel parts were provided and required to wear 3M 6200 half-face respirators with NIOSH 6001 organic vapor cartridges. Employees had not been fit-tested.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 M02
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck(s): On or about January 25, 2024, in the warehouse, employees were feeding wires underneath machinery such as but not limited to meat machinery and shaker sealer while being lifted by a powered industrial truck.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $8067
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.178 O01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(1): The employer did not ensure that only stable or safely arranged loads were handled: On or about January 25, 2024, in the warehouse, employees operated forklifts to transport machines such as but not limited to a meat and shaker sealer which were not stable and safely arranged.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $8067
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $5,700 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): On or about January 25, 2024, inside of the machine shop area, the employer did not determine the exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI) while performing welding tasks on materials such as but not limited to stainless steel.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $5700
- — C (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about January 25, 2024, inside of the machine shop, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program that included information related to hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] for employees welding on stainless steel materials.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6775.2
- — C (S) $11292
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.1200 E01 II
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(ii): The written hazard communication program did not include the methods the employer would use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, and the hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas: On or about January 25, 2024, inside of the machine shop, prior to assigning non-routine tasks the employer did not have a written safe operating procedure that identified hazards employees can potentially encounter, including but not limited to hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)] contained in stainless steel materials being welded on by employees.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about January 25, 2024, inside of the machine shop, employees exposed to hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)] contained on stainless steel materials, and the employer had not provided effective information and training on the hazardous chemicals in the work area.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333993)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347233918.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.