LONDON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SAMUEL YODER
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SAMUEL YODER in 1394 EAST CHOCTAW DRIVE, LONDON, OH 43140 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347239865.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAMUEL YODER
- Site address
- 1394 EAST CHOCTAW DRIVE
- City
- LONDON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43140
- Mailing
- 8510 WEST PROSPECT ROAD, HILLSBORO, OH 45133
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- May 13, 2024
- Abate by
- May 31, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $1,729 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: a. Samuel Yoder located at 1394 East Choctaw Drive, London, OH 43140: On or about January 29, 2024, the employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs that included work rules, training, inspections and enforcement at a residential construction site where employees were exposed to fall of over 18 feet and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1728.5
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 13, 2024
- Abate by
- May 23, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,420 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. Samuel Yoder located at 1394 East Choctaw Drive, London, OH 43140: On or about January 29, 2024, the employer did not ensure employees engaged in residential roofing/framing activities at heights over 6 feet were protected from falls. Framers were installing materials on a new construction residential building without any form of fall protection which exposed the employees to falls of over 18 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2419.5
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 13, 2024
- Abate by
- May 31, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $1,729 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a. Samuel Yoder located at 1394 East Choctaw Drive, London, OH 43140: On or about January 29, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to falls were provided with a fall protection training program. Employees engaged in residential roofing and framing activities working at heights of over 18 feet, were not trained on the recognition of fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1728.5
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.602 D
- Issued
- May 13, 2024
- Abate by
- May 31, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $1,729 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d):Powered industrial truck operator training. Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under this paragraph are identical to those set forth at §1910.178(l) of this chapter. [44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979; 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 58 FR 35183, June 30, 1993; 63 FR 66274, Dec. 1, 1998] 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer shall ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). a. Samuel Yoder located at 1394 East Choctaw Drive, London, OH 43140: On or about January 29, 2024, the employer did not ensure an employee who operated a Mustang rough terrain powered industrial forklift, Model Number 638 to move/handle materials throughout the worksite was trained/certified to operate powered industrial equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1728.5
- — Z (S) $3457
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347239865.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.