KITTANNING, PA —
OSHA Inspection: CUSTOM DESIGN MONUMENTS
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CUSTOM DESIGN MONUMENTS in 399 BUTLER ROAD, KITTANNING, PA 16201 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 347248718.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CUSTOM DESIGN MONUMENTS
- Site address
- 399 BUTLER ROAD
- City
- KITTANNING
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16201
- Mailing
- 399 BUTLER ROAD, KITTANNING, PA 16201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees who are required to use respiratory protection in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2074
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee's ability to use a respirator when the employee was required to use a respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not provide a fit test prior to initial use of a respirator, to an employee who is required to use a tight fitting respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide annual respirator training to employees who are required to use a respirator in the workplace: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not provide respirator training to employees who are required to use respiratory protection in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.94 A05 II
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.94(a)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that abrasive-blasting respirators were worn by all abrasive-blasting operators when working inside of a blast-cleaning room: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not ensure that an abrasive-blasting respirator was worn by an employee who works inside of a blast-cleaning room.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain a written hazard communication program at the facility. Employees at the facility work with hazardous materials including but not limited to respirable crystalline silica and aluminum oxide.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous materials in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in the workplace: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not provide training to employees on the hazardous materials in their work area. Employees at the facility work with hazardous materials including but not limited to respirable crystalline silica and aluminum oxide.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 J03 I
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(j)(3)(i): The employer did ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not provide information and training to employees on the hazards associated with respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1053 D01
- Issued
- May 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section: a) In the Facility, on or about February 1, 2024 - The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level. Employees of the facility perform blasting operations on granite stone.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347248718.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.