TINLEY PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL HUERTADO DBA MIGUEL HUERTADO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL HUERTADO DBA MIGUEL HUERTADO in 17212-17222 LONGFORD LN., TINLEY PARK, IL 60477 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347253650.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL HUERTADO DBA MIGUEL HUERTADO
- Site address
- 17212-17222 LONGFORD LN.
- City
- TINLEY PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60477
- Mailing
- 1904 9TH PKWY., WAUKEGAN, IL 60085
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about June 10, 2024, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 0300305/06/2024
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 2, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about January 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 2, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): (a) a. On or about January 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, exceeding twenty-five (25') feet above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 2, 2024
- Abate by
- May 6, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about January 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 2, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:(a) a. On or about January 29, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347253650.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.