FATE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: EDDIE SAENZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDDIE SAENZ in 725 SHIRLEY DR., FATE, TX 75189 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347269763.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDDIE SAENZ
- Site address
- 725 SHIRLEY DR.
- City
- FATE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75189
- Mailing
- 3022 ROSEWOOD HILLS DR, GARLAND, TX 75040
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- May 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees using nail guns exposing them to eye injuries by not wearing safety glasses
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2765
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Abate by
- May 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees were exposed to falls to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- May 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: (a) On or about January 5, 2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards to the lower level by not having ladder or stair access.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347269763.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.