Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LIVE AXE INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LIVE AXE INC in 96 LAFAYETTE STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10013 (NAICS 722511). OSHA activity number 347273807.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Live AXE INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Live AXE INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LIVE AXE INC
Site address
96 LAFAYETTE STREET
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10013
Mailing
96 LAFAYETTE STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10013
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722511
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $2,420 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the downstairs rage room were required to wear a 3M tight fitting respirator while cleaning up dust and debris from broken plates, laptops, and computer monitors. The employer did not establish or implement a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures.   NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2419.5
  • — Z (S) $4839

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the downstairs rage room were required to wear a 3M tight fitting respirator while cleaning up dust and debris from broken plates, laptops, and computer monitors. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the downstairs rage room were required to wear a 3M tight fitting respirator while cleaning up dust and debris from broken plates, laptops, and computer monitors. The employer did not fit test employees prior to their use of the respirator in the workplace.  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the downstairs rage room were required to wear a 3M tight fitting respirator while cleaning up dust and debris from broken plates, laptops, and computer monitors. The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the items in section (i)-(vii).  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the downstairs rage room were required to wear a 3M tight fitting respirator while cleaning up dust and debris from broken plates, laptops, and computer monitors. The employer permitted employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function to wear a half face tight fitting respirator while cleaning the downstairs rage room.  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the facility were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to Sodium hypochlorite 5-7% by weight. The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances S103

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)   On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the facility were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to Sodium hypochlorite 5-7% by weight. The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work areas.  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2024
Abate by
Aug 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about 02/09/2024 at 96 Lafayette St, New York, NY 10013, workers cleaning the facility were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to Sodium hypochlorite 5-7% by weight. The employer did not provided employees with effective information and training on the hazardous chemicals in the employees work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1,000 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347273807.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.