Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CITY CONSTRUCTION 1 INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CITY CONSTRUCTION 1 INC. in 1738 CROTONA PARK EAST, BRONX, NY 10460 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 347273849.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch City Construction 1 INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for City Construction 1 INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1738 CROTONA PARK EAST
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10460
Mailing
135 BAY 25TH ST., BROOKLYN, NY 11214
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  a) Employees, engaged in masonry work, had to climb over debris that was located throughout their work area.   NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,687 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:  location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  a) An employee was using a Bosch right angle grinder to cut block. The grinder was missing a guard for the cutting wheel.   location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  b) An employee was using a Bosch right angle grinder to cut tile. The grinder was missing a guard for the cutting disc.    NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3687

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,610 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors:  location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  a) An employee was using electrical equipment, including a DeWalt angle grinder, while engaged in masonry work. The employee was not provided with GFCI protection or an assured equipment grounding conductor program.   NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4610

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  a) An employee was using electrical equipment, including a DeWalt angle grinder, while engaged in masonry work. The extension cord was not provided with strain relief.  NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  a) An employee was using electrical equipment, including a DeWalt angle grinder, while engaged in masonry work. An extension cord that was being used was missing the insulation, exposing the metal wire.    NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B09 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,452 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(9)(i): Each employee performing overhand bricklaying and related work 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a controlled access zone:  location: roof on or about: 2/8/24  a) Employees, laying bricks and stone, were not using fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of 40 feet.    NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $6452

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347273849.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.