AMELIA, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: LAD SERVICES OF LOUISIANA LLC
Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of LAD SERVICES OF LOUISIANA LLC in 2575 HIGHWAY 662, AMELIA, LA 70340 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 347273989.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LAD SERVICES OF LOUISIANA LLC
- Site address
- 2575 HIGHWAY 662
- City
- AMELIA
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70340
- Mailing
- 1043 EAST STEPHENSVILLE ROAD, MORGAN CITY, LA 70380
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Fatality or catastrophe (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336611
- Employees
- 166
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1915.73 D
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $14,518 · Current $11,615 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.73(d): When employees were exposed to unguarded edges of decks, platforms, flats, or similar flat surfaces, more than 5 feet above a solid surface, the edges were not guarded by adequate guardrails meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1915.71(j)(1) and (2): On or about February 10, 2024, on the deck of JMC 300 Barge, employees were exposed for fall hazard due to unguarded edges.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $11615
- · Z (S) $14518
1915.73 E
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $14,518 · Current $10,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.73(e): When employees were working near the unguarded edges of decks of vessels afloat, they were not protected by personal flotation devices meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1915.158: On or about February 10, 2024, employees performed work tasks near the unguarded edge of a barge deck afloat without wearing Personal Flotation Devices (PFDs).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $10500
- · Z (S) $14518
1915.152 B
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,222 · Current $4,977 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1915.152(b):Hazard assessment and equipment. The employer shall assess its work activity to determine whether there are hazards present, or likely to be present, which necessitate the employee's use of PPE. On or about February 10, 2024, the employer did not perform a PPE hazard assessment before allowing employees to conduct repair work on a barge.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $4977
- · Z (S) $6222
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Aug 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2):The employer did not complete an OSHA 301 Incident Report form, or an equivalent form, for each recordable injury or illness entered on the OSHA 300 Log: a) On or about July 10, 2021, an employee sustained a cut right hand, resulting in job transfer or restrictions. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. b) On or about July 20, 2021, an employee sustained a fractured right foot, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. c) On or about August 2, 2021, an employee sustained a hurt back, resulting in Days Away from Work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. d) On or about August 11, 2021, an employee sustained a fractured right leg, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. e) On or about August 13, 2021, an employee sustained a hurt back, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. f) On or about November 20, 2021, an employee sustained a fractured right arm, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. g) On or about July 25, 2022, an employee sustained a nose injury, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. h) On or about October 4, 2022, an employee sustained a fractured leg, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. i) On or about February 22, 2023, an employee sustained a cut finger, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. j) On or about May 30, 2023, an employee sustained a shoulder injury, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury. k) On or about August 13, 2023, an employee sustained a hurt back, resulting in days away from work. The employer did not complete an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for this work-related injury.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $2074
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336611)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347273989.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.