ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FLORES ROOFING & MORE, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FLORES ROOFING & MORE, INC. in 1245 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD, ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347281065.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLORES ROOFING & MORE, INC.
- Site address
- 1245 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD
- City
- ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60005
- Mailing
- 2927 78TH COURT, ELMWOOD PARK, IL 60707
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,665 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about February 12, 2024, employees were exposed to eye injury while operating pneumatic nail guns without the benefit of eye protection. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2665
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) On or about February 12, 2024, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately 11 feet where a portable ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface of a roof. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: a) On or about February 12, 2024, the horizontal distances (angle) from the top supports to the feet of a non-self-supporting ladder used for roof access between the ground and the roof deck was greater than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. No abatement certification or documentation required this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) On or about February 12, 2024, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while working without fall protection from a first story roof deck having a ground to eave height of approximately 11 feet. b) On or about February 12, 2024, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while working without fall protection from a second story roof deck having a ground to eave height of approximately 18 feet. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D06 I
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,835 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): Snaphooks were engaged directly to webbing, rope or wire rope: a) On or about February 12, 2024, snaphooks were connected to the nylon webbing of body harnesses used for fall protection on pitched roof surfaces. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2835
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: a) On or about February 12, 2024, the front nylon straps of body harnesses were used as attachment points for fall protection on pitched roof surfaces. No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Flores Roofing & More, INC.
View Flores Roofing & More, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347281065.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.