Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DFA DAIRY BRANDS FLUID, LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of DFA DAIRY BRANDS FLUID, LLC in 1199 WEST CENTRAL STREET, FRANKLIN, MA 02038 (NAICS 311511). OSHA activity number 347294092.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DFA Dairy Brands Fluid, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DFA Dairy Brands Fluid, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1199 WEST CENTRAL STREET
City
FRANKLIN
State
MA
ZIP
02038
Mailing
1199 WEST CENTRAL STREET, FRANKLIN, MA 02038
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311511
Employees
400
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.29 B02 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,340 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.29(b)(2)(iii):Intermediate vertical members were not installed so they were no more than 19 inches apart.  Location: Roof top. Northeast section condenser D walkway.   On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while walking and working were a opening in the guard rail system was greater than 19 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12340

1910.119 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Abate by
Sep 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.119(c)(2): Employers shall consult with employees and their representatives on the conduct and development of process hazards analyses and on the development of the other elements of process safety management in this standard.  a) PSM Processes    On or about February 21, 2024, and at time prior,  the employer did not consult with employees and their representatives on the conduct and development of process hazards analyses and on the development of the other elements of process safety management in this standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.119 F01 I D

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Abate by
Sep 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR  1910.119(f)(1)(i)(D):The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in emergency shutdown including the assignment of shutdown responsibility to qualified operators to ensure that emergency shutdown was executed in a safe and timely manner.  Location: Work Place. Roof equipment  On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not implement effective emergency shut down procedures of the ammonia refrigeration equipment, in that the operating procedures did not provide clear instructions for shutdown of ammonia refrigeration equipment on the roof in the event of an uncontrolled release.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.119 J04 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Abate by
Dec 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $8,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): The inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.  Location: Workplace production.   On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior,  the employer failed to inspect or take actions to further evaluate or remediate:   a) sections of uninsulated piping that exhibited signs of deterioration such as corrosion exposing employees to the hazard of ammonia inhalation.  b) Valve inspection and maintenance to operate valves to assist in maintenance, repair and in an emergency situation; mitigate uncontrolled release and leaks exposing employees to the hazard of ammonia inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $8000
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.119 J04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 250 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.119(j)(4)(iii):The frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment was not consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations and good engineering practices, and more frequently if determined to be necessary by prior operating experience:  Location: workplace.   On or about, February 21, 2024 the ammonia gas sensors through out the facility had not been calibrated according to the manufactures requirement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8000
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.146 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,816 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(1):The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:  Location: Workplace; roof  On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not conduct an evaluation of permit entry spaces where employees could enter a, roof top refrigeration unit via a hatchway, to preform maintenance while being exposed to moving mechanical parts and electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8816

1910.146 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces. A sign reading DANGER-PERMIT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE, DO NOT ENTER or using other similar language would satisfy the requirement for a sign.  Location: Roof top                          On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior the employer failed to identify confined spaces in ammonia refrigeration rooftop units by posting signage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 I B

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Abate by
Sep 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer's piping and instrument diagrams were not accurate and did not represent equipment that was existing and was part of the process.  Location: Worksite. Piping in ammonia refrigeration engine room.  On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior, the employer's piping and instrument diagrams did not accurately depict the proper valve sizing on the high-pressure vessel receiver piping.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.120 Q06 II

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2024
Abate by
Sep 27, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(6)(ii): First responders at the operational level did not receive at least eight hours of training or did not have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas required by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii)(A) through (q)(6)(ii)(F) and/or the employer did not so certify:   Location: Workplace.   On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees who respond during an ammonia leak were provided with training that adequately addressed elements including, but not limited to, the monitoring of ammonia exposure levels, the selection and use of personal protective equipment containment and confinement operations or decontamination of hazardous materials that may be encountered in an emergency response  Or in the alternative;   29 CFR 1910.38(c)(3): The emergency action plan did not include the procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate:  On or about February 21, 2024, and at times prior the emergency action plan did not include adequate procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate in that the plan did not specify how employees would evaluate the ammonia levels in their workplace and be provided with appropriate personal protective equipment such as respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View DFA Dairy Brands Fluid, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347294092.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.