DANVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: GOODLOE E. MOORE, INCORPORATED
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GOODLOE E. MOORE, INCORPORATED in 1019 GRIGGS STREET, DANVILLE, IL 61832 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 347301665.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GOODLOE E. MOORE, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 1019 GRIGGS STREET
- City
- DANVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61832
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 846, DANVILLE, IL 61834
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 48
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II D
- Issued
- May 9, 2024
- Abate by
- May 24, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $4,840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control: On or about February 15, 2024, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards on a punch press during a maintenance and service work operation, and the employer's machine specific lockout procedure for the punch press did not contain specific requirements for testing the machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4840
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.147 C06 I A
- Issued
- May 9, 2024
- Abate by
- May 24, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $4,840 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(A): The periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was not performed by an authorized employee other than the one utilizing the energy control procedure being inspected: On or about February 15, 2024, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards on a punch press during a maintenance and service work operation, and the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of the energy control standard were being followed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4840
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- May 9, 2024
- Abate by
- May 24, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control: On or about February 15, 2024, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards on a punch press during a maintenance and service work operation, and the employer had not provided the employee with authorized lockout training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6775
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.147 D
- Issued
- May 9, 2024
- Abate by
- May 20, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): On or about February 15, 2024, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards on a punch press during a maintenance and service work operation, and the employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements}. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect the employee from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6775
- — Z (S) $11292
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347301665.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.