GRIFFIN, GA —
OSHA Inspection: ABH ENTERPRISES INC - ALABAMA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ABH ENTERPRISES INC - ALABAMA in 1520 KALAMAZOO DR., GRIFFIN, GA 30224 (NAICS 324121). OSHA activity number 347304602.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ABH ENTERPRISES INC - ALABAMA
- Site address
- 1520 KALAMAZOO DR.
- City
- GRIFFIN
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30224
- Mailing
- P.O.BOX 20348, TUSCALOOSA, AL 35402
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 324121
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I A
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,936 · Current $2,962 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i)(a): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by a standard guardrail system. a) Production floor; Saturation Line 1: On or about February 27, 2024, and times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the employer did not install a guardrail on an elevated platform approximately 6-foot, 10-inches, where workers perform monthly maintenance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2961.6
- — Z (S) $4936
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,936 · Current $2,962 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a) Production warehouse near supply room; West facing side of building: On or about February 27, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards, in that an emergency exit leading to the exterior of the building was not clearly marked with a sign reading "Exit".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2961.6
- — Z (S) $4936
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $7,405 · Current $4,443 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary, whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: a) Production floor: On or about February 27, 2024, the employer exposed employees to burn hazards, in that the employer did not enforce the use of protective equipment for employee's arms while they rethread product through the line and/or cleared paper out of the saturator tank that contained 420-degree F molten asphalt.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4443
- — Z (S) $7405
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $7,405 · Current $4,443 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) Production floor: On or about February 27, 2024, the employer exposed employees to burn hazards, in that the employer did not enforce the use of eye or face protection while employees rethread product through the line and/or cleared paper out of the saturator tank that contained 420-degree F molten asphalt.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4443
- — Z (S) $7405
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $7,405 · Current $4,443 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet were exposed to electrical hazards: a) Production floor: On or about February 27, 2024, the employer exposed employees to burn hazards, in that the employer did not enforce the use of protective footwear while employees rethread product through the line and/or cleared paper out of the saturator tank that contained 420-degree F molten asphalt.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4443
- — Z (S) $7405
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,936 · Current $2,962 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a) Production floor: On or about February 27, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to caught-in and burn hazards, in that the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control program when employees conduct maintenance on the saturator line and tank.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2961.6
- — Z (S) $4936
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: a) Production floor: On or about February 27, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to chemical hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that spray containers of diesel fuel used for lubrication were labeled with the contents and the hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 324121)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347304602.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.