Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GEORGETOWN WOOD AND PALLET CO. INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GEORGETOWN WOOD AND PALLET CO. INC. in 5781 ST. RT. 1, GEORGETOWN, IL 61846 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 347311219.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Georgetown Wood and Pallet CO. INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Georgetown Wood and Pallet CO. INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5781 ST. RT. 1
City
GEORGETOWN
State
IL
ZIP
61846
Mailing
P.O. BOX 235, GEORGETOWN, IL 61846
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
96
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 26, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,453 · Current $4,517 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  On or about February 27, 2024, employees working in Building #1 and in the maintenance building, were exposed to fire, smoke inhalation, slips, trips and fall hazards in the event of an emergency because the exit door was not marked with an exit sign.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4517
  • — Z (S) $6453

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $3,387 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  On or about February 27, 2024, an employee marking pallets was exposed to hazardous chemicals, and the employer had not conducted an effective personal protective equipment hazard assessment to include the use of hand/eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3387
  • — Z (S) $4839

1910.147 C04 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $5,646 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A): The energy control procedures did not contain a specific statement on the intended use of the procedure:  On or about February 27, 2024, employees were exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the saws and Woodpecker nailer, and the employer did not include a specific statement on the intended use of the procedures
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5646
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  On or about February 27, 2024, employees were exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the saws and Woodpecker nailer, and the employer did not clearly and specifically outline the steps to control the energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:  On or about February 27, 2024, employees were exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the saws and Woodpecker nailer, and the employer did not clearly and specifically outline the steps on how to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  On or about February 27, 2024, employees were exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the Woodpecker nailer, because the authorized employee had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $5,646 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  On or about February 27, 2024, an employee was exposed to hazardous energy sources when performing maintenance and servicing, including but not limited to the Woodpecker Nailer, because the employer did not cover the action listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6).  Employees who performed servicing and maintenance were not required to:  (1)	Know the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy,  (2)	Turn off and shut down the machine,  (3)	Physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source,  (4)	Affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device,  (5)	Prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.  (6)	Prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5646
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 11, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $5,646 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:  On or about February 27, 2024, an employee operating a forklift was exposed to struck by hazards and the employer did not ensure that each operator had completed formal instruction training prior to allowing employees to use the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5646
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 26, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $8,067
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about December 18, 2023, an employee was exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards because effective machine guarding was not in place on the Notcher to protect the operator from reaching in and making contact with the ingoing nip points.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8067
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 26, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,067 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven (7) feet or less above the floor or platform were not enclosed:  On or about February 27, 2024, an employee was exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards on the saw in Building 2 due to a chain and sprocket which was seven (7) feet or less above the floor was not enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $8067

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jul 3, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about February 27, 2024, an employee marking the pallets, was exposed to hazardous chemicals and the employer did not provide the employees with any hazard communication training.  This training would include the following:   Employees shall be Informed of the following: a.	The requirements of this section, b.	Any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present, and c.	The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets. Training: a.	Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in their work area, b.	The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in their work area, c.	The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards,  d.	The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, and  e.	The pictogram labeling requirements in accordance with the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4839

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 26, 2024
Penalty
Initial $1,613 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and/or an incident report (OSHA Form 301or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness has occurred:   On or about December 18, 2023, a work-related injury occurred and was not recorded and entered on the OSHA 300 Log within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury had occurred.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1613

View Georgetown Wood and Pallet CO. INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347311219.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.