CLEVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ITALMATCH CHEMICALS
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ITALMATCH CHEMICALS in 1000 BELTLINE STREET, CLEVELAND, OH 44109 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 347326142.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ITALMATCH CHEMICALS
- Site address
- 1000 BELTLINE STREET
- City
- CLEVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44109
- Mailing
- 1000 BELT LINE STREET, CLEVELAND, OH 44109
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325998
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2024
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,904 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to pressure vessel overpressure hazards associated with a jacketed steam kettle which was not installed and maintained to prevent or minimize risk for employee injury during an overpressure event: Location: The Elco Corporation, 1000 Beltline St., Cleveland, OH 44109 On or about and times prior to February 27, 2024, employees were exposed to pressure vessel overpressure hazards associated with the Kettle 5. The Kettle did not have equipment, such as a safety valve, for relieving excess pressure from the jacket for protection against hazards associated with vessel overpressure. The employer did not ensure employees working in the Plant 5 South Building were protected from burn hazards during the process of manufacturing chemicals in kettles, as well as the cleaning of the kettles between batches when the required temperature is exceeded. The steam kettle suffered an overpressure that led to vessel failure and an employee received 1st and 2nd degree burns when Kettle #5 reached a temperature of 212 degrees Fahrenheit as steam was rising out of the kettle.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $7904.4
- — I (S) $7904.4
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(c): The employer did not provide, and ensure each employee used, a safe means of access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces: On or about February 27, 2024, the employer did not provide a safe means of egress to employees working near and around Kettle #5. There was a four-shelf metal unit with supplies on each shelf and a rolling pallet jack partially blocking the egress aisleway. During the incident on February 27, 2024 the egress aisleway was partially blocked which impeded the path resulting in the employee having to walk through hot steam from the over pressurized vessel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2):Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points. On or about February 27, 2024, the employer did not ensure that the path of egress located behind kettle #5 was at least 28 inches wide. The employer had a four-shelf metal unit behind kettle #5 which caused there to only be 15 inches of clearance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a):Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact: On or about February 27, 2024, the employer did not provide adequate personal protective equipment rated for the work being performed. An employee received thermal burns from hot steam while wearing a Tyvek 400 suit that was not rated for the hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6775.2
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: On or about February 27, 2024, the employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed. The following to include but not limited to safety glass, respirators, hearing protection, googles, Tyvek suits, and hard hat are required when performing different job tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c):Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) On or about February 27, 2024, the employer failed to provide suitable facilities for flushing of the eyes within the work area when employees were exposed to caustic chemicals to include, but not limited to Elco 8103, Elco 8801 and Elco 47911 when it is added to the kettles in the upper level of the Plant 5 South Building. The employer had not ensured the emergency eye wash/shower station was maintained in accordance to ANSI Z358.1, 2009. The emergency eyewash/shower station was not activated weekly to ensure operability and availability of water. b) On or about February 27, 2024, the employer did not provide a clear path to the eye wash station located by Kettle # 5. The eye wash station was blocked by a pallet jack full of material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6775.2
- — Z (S) $11292
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325998)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347326142.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.