EUCLID, OH —
OSHA Inspection: BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC. in 24703 EUCLID AVE., EUCLID, OH 44117 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 347335655.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 24703 EUCLID AVE.
- City
- EUCLID
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44117
- Mailing
- 24703 EUCLID AVE, EUCLID, OH 44117
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 425
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $9,218 · Current $0 Reduced
2240
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of silver metal listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 0.01 mg/m3: Employee exposures to silver metal exceeded the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.01 mg/m3 listed in Table Z-1 for instances such as, but not limited to: a.) On or about March 11, 2024, an employee was exposed to silver metal that exceeded the PEL while performing abrasive cleaning activities in the bench assembly area. The employee was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 0.189 mg/m3 for particulates not otherwise regulated total dust, approximately 18.9 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.01 mg/m3. The exposure level was derived from samples collected over a 393 minute sampling period, with zero exposure assumed for the unsampled period of 87 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9218
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2240
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to comply with 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) and assure that employee exposure to silver metal was below the permissible exposure limit. Employees with exposure in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) included the following instances: a.) On or about March 11, 2024, an employee was exposed to silver metal that exceeded the PEL while performing abrasive cleaning activities in the bench assembly area. The employee was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 0.189 mg/m3 for particulates not otherwise regulated total dust, approximately 18.9 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.01 mg/m3. The exposure level was derived from samples collected over a 393 minute sampling period, with zero exposure assumed for the unsampled period of 87 minutes. Controls usually applicable in these circumstances include but are not limited to: 1. Local ventilation effectively installed during abrasive cleaning operations. Step 1: Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measure to control employee exposure to air contaminants as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation: 1. Evaluation of engineering control options 2. Selection of optimum control method and completion of design 3. Procurement, installation, and operation of selected control measures 4. Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls Step 2: All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Proposed control measures selected should be appropriate to the type of material present. Thirty day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Abatement must be completed by 60 days. Step 3: Abatement should be completed by the implementation of feasible engineering.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Bwxt Nuclear Operations Group, INC.
View Bwxt Nuclear Operations Group, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347335655.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.