Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE BONILLA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE BONILLA in 250 GERAULT RD., FLOWER MOUND, TX 75028 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347339277.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Bonilla — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Bonilla is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE BONILLA
Site address
250 GERAULT RD.
City
FLOWER MOUND
State
TX
ZIP
75028
Mailing
3334 MARCH LANE, GARLAND, TX 75042
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2024
Abate by
May 13, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.   On or about March 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, employees operating Hitachi nail guns while performing roofing activities were not wearing eye protection, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2074

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2024
Abate by
May 13, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about March 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, employees engaged in applying building materials were not provided fall protection exposing employees to an unprotected fall hazard of approximately 17 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2024
Abate by
May 13, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    On or about March 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, employees engaged in applying building materials were not provided fall training program exposing employees to an unprotected fall hazard of approximately 17 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2024
Abate by
May 13, 2024
Penalty
Initial $388 · Current $388
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  On or about March 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees safely used the ladder to gain access to the residential roof.  The ladder was not secured at the top and did not extend three feet above the landing surface. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2024
Abate by
May 13, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)Note:  29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2) may be cited as an additional violation to support this requirement.   On or about March 12, 2024, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees had a ladder safety program where employees used the ladder to gain access to the residential roof.  The ladder was not secured at the top and did not extend three feet above the landing surface. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jose Bonilla's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347339277.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.