MONTGOMERY, AL —
OSHA Inspection: MOUNTAIN OAK MONTGOMERY MILL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MOUNTAIN OAK MONTGOMERY MILL in 2550 JACKSON FERRY ROAD, MONTGOMERY, AL 36104 (NAICS 321113). OSHA activity number 347342271.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MOUNTAIN OAK MONTGOMERY MILL
- Site address
- 2550 JACKSON FERRY ROAD
- City
- MONTGOMERY
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36104
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 728, HAMILTON, GA 31811
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321113
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,687 · Current $2,212 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury: a) Throughout the mill: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to laceration hazards in that a Lockout/Tagout program was not established consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that all hazardous energy was isolated before employees performed servicing or maintenance on equipment, such as but not limited to the Chipper.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2212.2
- — Z (S) $3687
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control: a) Throughout the mill: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed employees to perform servicing or maintenance on equipment, such as but not limited to the Chipper, without first providing them with adequate lock out / tag out training, exposing the employees to laceration hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,687 · Current $2,212 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) Sawmill Area: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate a powered industrial truck without the employer first ensuring the employee was competent to operate the equipment as demonstrated by the completion of the required training and evaluation specified by the regulation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2212.2
- — Z (S) $3687
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a) Sawmill Area: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto employees were allowed to operate the JLG Telehandler and the Yale Forklift without first performing a preoperational inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.265 C04 IV
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,687 · Current $2,212 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.265(c)(4)(iv): Elevated platform(s), 4 feet or more from the floor level, were not provided with a standard railing: a) Debarker Walkway: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 12 feet from the debarker walkway to the ground below in that the stairway to the upper walkway was not provided with a guardrail or stair rail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2212.2
- — Z (S) $3687
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition: a) In the Maintenance Workshop: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto, a Kidde 10-pound Class ABC fire extinguisher used by employee fire watches for oxy-acetylene cutting was found to have been depressurized and not in a state of readiness for instant use. b) At the Main Sawmill: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto, a Kidde 15-pound Class ABC fire extinguisher was found to have been depressurized and not in a state of readiness for instant use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2):Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: a) Sawmill: On or about March 13, 2024, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not require portable fire extinguishers to be inspected at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Sawmill: On or about March 13, 2024, the employer had not developed, implemented, and/or maintained at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees who worked with such hazardous materials as but not limited to hydraulic fluids, engine oils, lubricants, and fuels for the powered industrial vehicles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321113)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347342271.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.