Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ETHERINGTON BROTHERS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ETHERINGTON BROTHERS, INC. in 33 STAFFORD AVENUE, BRISTOL, CT 06010 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 347348344.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Etherington Brothers, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Etherington Brothers, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
33 STAFFORD AVENUE
City
BRISTOL
State
CT
ZIP
06010
Mailing
33 STAFFORD AVENUE, BRISTOL, CT 06010
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces are inspected, regularly and as necessary, and maintained in a safe condition:  Men's Restroom:  On, or about, March 14, 2024, water leaked from the large sink which resulted in water being present on the floor where employees had to walk.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2074

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) and that describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Company:  On, or about, May 14, 2024, the employer had not developed a written Hazard Communication Program that addressed the basic elements required by the standard including a list of hazardous materials located in the workplace, container labeling, safety data sheets, contractor employers and hazards associated with non-routine tasks.  Employees were exposed to particles generated from the buffing/grinding process from both the abrasive media used and the metals that were processed, including the potential for combustible dust to be generated.  Metals processed included brass, aluminum, steel and nickel.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical:  Company, On, or about, May 14, 2024, the employer had not obtained Safety Data Sheets for the alloys that were processed in buffing/grinding operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Company:  On, or about, May 14, 2024, the employer had not provided training to employees regarding the Hazard Communication Standard, pictograms, how to read Safety Data Sheets and hazards associated with dusts generated in the buffing/grinding process, including the potential of some dusts to be combustible.  Metals processed included brass, aluminum, steel and nickel.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2024
Abate by
Jul 19, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(6):  The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  Company:  On, or about, March 14, 2024, employees who wore N95 masks on a voluntary basis had not been provided with information regarding the proper use and limitations of filtering facepieces.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B07 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.303(b)(7)(iii):  Internal parts of electrical equipment, including busbars, wiring terminals, insulators, and other surfaces, were damaged or contaminated by foreign materials such as paint, plaster, cleaners, abrasives, or corrosive residues:  Buffing/Grinding Area:  On, or about, March 14, 2024, fugitive dust had accumulated in the electrical enclosure on the first Bader belt grinder.  The dust was coating internal electrical components within the enclosure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347348344.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.