CAMBRIDGE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: EVELIO LEMUS
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of EVELIO LEMUS in 2 FOREST STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02140 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347387920.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EVELIO LEMUS
- Site address
- 2 FOREST STREET
- City
- CAMBRIDGE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02140
- Mailing
- 12 GARDINER ST APT 2, LYNN, MA 01905
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun. Location: Job site; On or about 04/03/2024, employees were allowed to utilize pneumatic nail gun(s) without proper eye/face protection to protect against potential flying objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Location: Job site; On or about 04/03/2024, employees were allowed to engage in roofing activities without the use of fall protection on a residential roof that was 25-feet above the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access nor was the ladder secured at it's top to a ridged support and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, provided to assist the employee in mounting and dismounting the the ladder. Location: Job site; On or about 04/03/2024, employees were allowed to utilize a portable extension ladder which did not extend 3-feet above the upper landing surface of the roof which it was being used to gain access to.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347387920.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.