BETHANY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: BEEMER LANDSCAPING, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BEEMER LANDSCAPING, INC. in 811 S 38TH ST, BETHANY, MO 64424 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 347393316.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BEEMER LANDSCAPING, INC.
- Site address
- 811 S 38TH ST
- City
- BETHANY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64424
- Mailing
- 14185 NW 102ND AVE., GRANGER, IA 50109
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2):The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye. At a job site located at 811 S 38th St, Bethany, MO; employees were exposed to burn hazards. On March 29, 2024, an employee was injured as a result of burns which resulted in an in-patient hospitalization. The in-patient hospitalization of the employee was not reported to OSHA within 24 hours.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2074
- — Z (S) $2074
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: At a job site located at 811 S 38th St, Bethany, MO; employees were exposed to respiratory hazards. Employees conducting pool installation work were engaged in required respirator use when handling chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone, gel coating, and catalyst. The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2765
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: At a job site located at 811 S 38th St, Bethany, MO; employees were exposed to respiratory hazards. Employees conducting pool installation work were engaged in required respirator use when handling chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone, gel coating, and catalyst. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to each respirator user.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): At a job site located at 811 S 38th St, Bethany, MO; employees were exposed to respiratory hazards. Employees conducting pool installation work were engaged in required respirator use when handling chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone, gel coating, and catalyst. The employer did not perform a respirator fit test for each respirator user.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii):Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: At a job site located at 811 S 38th St, Bethany, MO; employees were exposed to respiratory and burn hazards. Employees conducting pool installation work were engaged in the use of acetone. The employees lacked the training and knowledge when handling the acetone, which led to employees applying acetone to the pool followed by heat. The exposure of the heat to the acetone led to fire and burns to the employee.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3000
- — C (S) $4148
- — Z (S) $4148
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347393316.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.