Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COYOTE ROOFING LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COYOTE ROOFING LLC in 641 SOUTH MAIN STREET, WEST BEND, WI 53095 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347399321.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coyote Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coyote Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
COYOTE ROOFING LLC
Site address
641 SOUTH MAIN STREET
City
WEST BEND
State
WI
ZIP
53095
Mailing
6058 NORTH 40TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53209
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 6, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)  (a) On or about April 9, 2024, located at 641 South Main Street, West Bend, WI 53095, the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspection of the job site where employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet while performing tear off operations on a two-story residential home.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1500
  • — C (S) $2074
  • — Z (S) $2074

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  (a) On or about April 9, 2024, located at 641 South Main Street, West Bend, WI 53095, the employer failed to ensure employees performing roof tear-off work on a two-story residential home were protected from falling to the lower level.  This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $4839
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  (a) On or about April 9, 2024, located at 641 South Main Street, West Bend, WI 53095, the employer failed to ensure employees tasked with performing tear-off and replacement of a roof on the two-story residential home had received fall protection training to be able to recognize hazards of falling associated with the job, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1500
  • — C (S) $2074
  • — Z (S) $2074

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
May 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,904
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) On or about April 9, 2024, located at 641 South Main Street, West Bend, WI 53095, the employer failed to ensure the ladder used to access the balcony on the back of the residential home extended at least three feet above the upper landing surface, exposing an employee to a fall hazard of approximately 11.5 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2904
  • — C (S) $2765
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
May 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  (a) On or about April 9, 2024, located at 641 South Main Street, West Bend, WI 53095, employees were exposed to fall hazards when accessing the balcony to remove shingles that had fallen onto the balcony during tear off of the existing roof.  Employee had to step down approximately 42 inches from the guardrail to the balcony platform, and the employer did not ensure a stairway or ladder was provided to all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches or more.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive siderails:  (a) On or about April 9, 2024, located at 641 South Main Street, West Bend, WI 53095, the employer failed to ensure extension ladders used to access the back patio of the two-story residential home had nonconductive siderails when used where an employee could contact overhead energized electrical lines, exposing employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3457
  • — Z (S) $3457

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347399321.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.