Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: EDIS OMAR HERNANDEZ BARRIENTOS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDIS OMAR HERNANDEZ BARRIENTOS in 146 S. UNIVERSITY BLVD., MOBILE, AL 36608 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347405227.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Edis Omar Hernandez Barrientos for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Edis Omar Hernandez Barrientos is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
146 S. UNIVERSITY BLVD.
City
MOBILE
State
AL
ZIP
36608
Mailing
1208 SABER CT., MOBILE, AL 36608
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $1,141 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) 146 S. University Blvd. Mobile AL; On or about April 11, 2024, and at times prior, the employer allowed his employee using a pneumatic nail gun without eye protection exposing his employees to a struck-by- hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1140.7
  • · Z (S) $2074

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $1,141 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employee(s) were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits that were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:  a) 146 S. University Blvd. Mobile AL; On or about April 11, 2024, at times prior, the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without first ensuring employees were protected from electric shock exposing his employees to electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1140.7
  • · Z (S) $2074

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8m) or more above the lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a) 146 S. University Blvd. Mobile AL; On or about April 11, 2024, and at times prior, the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 9 feet 4 inches to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1520.75
  • · Z (S) $2765

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 10, 2024
Abate by
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)146 S. University Blvd. Mobile AL; On or about April 11, 2024, and at times prior, the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activities without first ensuring his crew was trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet 4 inch to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347405227.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.