Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT - CENTRAL COAST FIELD OFFICE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT - CENTRAL COAST FIELD OFFICE in 940 2ND AVENUE, MARINA, CA 93933 (NAICS 924120). OSHA activity number 347406464.

Watch Bureau OF Land Management - Central Coast Field Office — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bureau OF Land Management - Central Coast Field Office is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
940 2ND AVENUE
City
MARINA
State
CA
ZIP
93933
Mailing
940 2ND AVENUE, MARINA, CA 93933
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
924120
Employees
30
Ownership type
D

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.   CCMA - The employer has assessed the workplace and determined that employees are required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE).   PPE such as hearing protection devices and eye protection have been provided but a signed, dated, and written certification has not been prepared.  Employees are exposed to health and physical hazards while working in regulated areas containing naturally occurring asbestos (NOA), applying pesticides, or operating equipment such as chain saws, earth moving equipment, and UTV's.
Recent events (2)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.95(k)(2):The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — P (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.95 M02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR  1910.95(m)(2)(i):The employer did not retain all employee audiometric test records obtained pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.95(g).
Recent events (2)
  • — P (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(2)(i): An employer may provide respirators at the request of employees or permit employees to use their own respirators, if the employer determines that such respirator use will not in itself create a hazard. If the employer determines that any voluntary respirator use is permissible, the employer shall provide the respirator users with the information contained in Appendix D to this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard")  CCAS - The employer did not provide a respirator user with the information contained in Appendix D as required.  The employee had been donning a 3M, half-face, tight fitting respirator to protect himself against overspray and organic vapors while spray painting a fuel tank.  The employee is potentially exposed to cardiovascular and respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — P (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user.  CCAS - The employer provided an employee with a 3M, half-face, tight fitting respirator for voluntary use prior to medical clearance. The employee uses the respirator when spray painting and working in regulated, NOA areas.   The employee is potentially exposed to cardiovascular and respiratory health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — P (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer shall not permit respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interferes with valve function.   CCAS, yard - On 8/7/24, an employee was donning a 3M, tight fitting respirator to protect against the health hazards associated with organic vapor generated while spray painting a fuel tank.  The employee has facial hair preventing a proper seal.  The employee was potentially exposed to the health hazards of organic vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — P (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347406464.