Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MORALES KONSTRUCTION LLC

Monitoring inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a monitoring safety inspection of MORALES KONSTRUCTION LLC in 1638 MILL ROAD, GREENLEAF, WI 54126 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347408064.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Morales Konstruction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Morales Konstruction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1638 MILL ROAD
City
GREENLEAF
State
WI
ZIP
54126
Mailing
924 ELIZABETH ST., GREEN BAY, WI 54302
Inspection type
Monitoring (D)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $3,387 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.   On or about April 9, 2024, at the worksite located at 1638 Mill Road, Greenleaf, Wisconsin; the employer failed to ensure employees performing reroofing activities on an approximately 4:12 pitch roof, were protected from falls of approximately nine-feet, two-inches.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3387.3
  • — Z (S) $4839

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347408064.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.