Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUPE GARCIA DBA LUPE GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUPE GARCIA DBA LUPE GARCIA in 16235 MAPLE RD., JOLIET, IL 60432 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347413759.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lupe Garcia DBA Lupe Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lupe Garcia DBA Lupe Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16235 MAPLE RD.
City
JOLIET
State
IL
ZIP
60432
Mailing
1503 DICKENS STREET, JOLIET, IL 60432
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2024
Abate by
Oct 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $388 · Current $388
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   a.  On or about September 16, 2024, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                                                Item Number                                    Abatement Date 0100208/13/2024
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a. On or about April 15, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, ten (10) feet seven (7) inches, above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4148

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2024
Abate by
Aug 13, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a. On or about April 15, 2024, at the above addressed jobsite, the employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a. On or about April 15, 2024, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface nor was it secured at the top, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4148

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347413759.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.