Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NJK ALLIED CONTRACTORS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NJK ALLIED CONTRACTORS LLC in 42 LENOX COURT, MONTVILLE, NJ 07045 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 347425696.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NJK Allied Contractors LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NJK Allied Contractors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
42 LENOX COURT
City
MONTVILLE
State
NJ
ZIP
07045
Mailing
83 AUGUSTA STREET, IRVINGTON, NJ 07111
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2):Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  Location: 42 Lenox Ct., Montville, NJ 07045  a) The employer did not ensure both legs of a scaffolding structure bore on an adequately firm foundation. The right leg of a two-legged pump jack scaffolding structure was resting in the dirt/mud without a mudsill or an acceptable firm foundation.  Violation occurred on about April 19, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4839

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   Location: 42 Lenox Ct., Montville, NJ 07045  a) The employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls.  An employee engaged in residential siding activities worked on a pump jack scaffolding structure at a height of 28 feet from the immediate landing surface was exposed to fall hazards for not having any means of fall protection systems, guardrails or safety net systems.  Violation occurred on or about April 19, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4839

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Abate by
Oct 31, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR  1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.   Location: 42 Lenox Ct., Montville, NJ 07045  a) The employer did not ensure that the poles of a pump jack scaffolding structure were also securely attached to the structure at the bottom, exposing an employee to hazards associated with a 28-foot fall.   Violation occurred on or about April 19, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4839

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   Location: 42 Lenox Ct., Montville, NJ 07045  a) The employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls off the roof.  An employee engaged in residential siding activities worked at or near the edge at heights greater than 6 feet and was not protected from falls off the roof by use of a personal fall arrest system, guardrail system, safety net, or any other means of fall protection.  Violation occurred on or about April 19, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4839

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347425696.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.