MERTON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: HD SIDING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HD SIDING LLC in N62 W27656 SERENITY DRIVE, MERTON, WI 53056 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347433245.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HD SIDING LLC
- Site address
- N62 W27656 SERENITY DRIVE
- City
- MERTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53056
- Mailing
- 5322 RADCLIFF DRIVE, GREENDALE, WI 53129
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 16, 2024
- Abate by
- May 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) (a) On or about April 23, 2024, the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the job site were not conducted by a competent person to ensure hazardous situations were found and corrected.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $3,457
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. (a) On or about April 24, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were wearing eye protection equipment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about April 23, 2024, employees conducting roofing work on a new residential property with a 8:12 pitch roof, were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 and 1/2 feet off the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 16, 2024
- Abate by
- May 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) On or about April 23, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 and 1/2 feet off the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 16, 2024
- Abate by
- May 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a ) On or about April 23, 2024, the employer did not ensure the portable extension ladder used by employees to access the roof of the residential home extended at least three feet above the upper landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 and 1/2 foot fall to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2765
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347433245.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.