Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PABLO GEOVANNY MOROCHO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PABLO GEOVANNY MOROCHO in 208 TREMONT AVE, CLIFTON, NJ 07011 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347449076.

Watch Pablo Geovanny Morocho — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pablo Geovanny Morocho is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
208 TREMONT AVE
City
CLIFTON
State
NJ
ZIP
07011
Mailing
470 ALDEN STREET, ORANGE, NJ 07050
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   a) Exterior sub roof:  Employee was exposed to head injuries while working below roofing activities. The employee was not protected by a hard hat or protective helmet, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4148.00 · Current $4148.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   a) Exterior sub roof: Employees were exposed eye and face injuries while installing roofing shingles. Employees were using a pneumatic nail gun without the use any type of eye and face protection, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4148

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employee(s) were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits that were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:  a) Building sub-Roof: Employees were exposed to electrical hazard while working next to the weather head of a residential home without any type of electrical effective guarding, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)  a) Exterior, Roof of the house: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet while engaged in roofing work on the roof of a residential home without a means of fall protection in place, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4148.00 · Current $4148.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d): Body belts were used after January 1, 1998, as part of personal fall arrest systems:  a) Roof: Employees were utilizing a body belt as part of personal fall arrest system while installing shingles on a roof, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4148

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Exterior, roof: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while using an extension ladder that was not extended at least 3 feet over the landing that they were accessing, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347449076.