FAIR LAWN, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: ON TIME CONTRACTING INC.
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of ON TIME CONTRACTING INC. in 515 PLAZA ROAD, FAIR LAWN, NJ 07410 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347449639.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ON TIME CONTRACTING INC.
- Site address
- 515 PLAZA ROAD
- City
- FAIR LAWN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07410
- Mailing
- 71 BETHUNE BLVD, SPRING VALLEY, NY 10977
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets. a) Ground level: Employees were exposed to head injuries while working on the ground level, and roofing activities were taking place 20 feet above them, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a) Church: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using pneumatic nail guns to install shingles and plywood, were not protected with any type of eye/face protection, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4148
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Exterior, Roof of church: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet while engaged in roofing activities on an 8/12 steep roof without means of fall protection in place, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): A training program was not provided to each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards, to enable that employee to recognize the hazards of falling, and be trained in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: a) Building Exterior-Roof: Employees required to work from heights greater than 6 feet, were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to follow and minimize those hazards, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) Building roof: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while transitioning from an extension ladder to the roof of a residential home. The ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B10
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The sides of non-self-supporting ladders were not placed so that each rail is equally supported; or was equipped with a single support attachment. a) Building exterior: Employees were using an extension ladder that each side rail was not equally supported or was equipped with a single support attachment, on or about 4/25/24.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347449639.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.