ETNA, ME —
OSHA Inspection: FY HOLDINGS CORP
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FY HOLDINGS CORP in 30 FAMILY CIRCLE, ETNA, ME 04434 (NAICS 313110). OSHA activity number 347466369.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FY HOLDINGS CORP
- Site address
- 30 FAMILY CIRCLE
- City
- ETNA
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04434
- Mailing
- 235 SINGLETON STREET, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 313110
- Employees
- 23
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $518 · Current $518
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1)): The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation had been abated: Office - The employer failed to certify abatement of Citation 1 Items 1b, 1C, and 2.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $518
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,610 · Current $3,227 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4):Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: Establishment - The employer did not obtain the manufacturer's written approval before using a front-end addition clamp attachment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3227
- — Z (S) $4610
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory-installed attachments; however, the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: Establishment - The powered industrial truck used with a front-end clamp attachment was not marked to identify the attachment, the approximate weight of the truck, and the attachment combination at maximum elevation with the load laterally centered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6):The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place: Production floor - There was no nameplate attached to the Hyster 30 Powered Industrial Truck (PIT).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,936 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Establishment - The Hyster 30 powered industrial truck was not taken out of service after finding the side shift hydraulic line in need of repair due to its damaged casing exposing the braided hydraulic tubing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1935.5
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.262 D03
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,452 · Current $4,516 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.262(d)(3): Nip point(s) of the feed roll(s) on opening and picking machinery were not covered with a guard designed to prevent the operator from reaching the nip while machinery was in operation: Carding machine area - In the following instances, the carding machine was not effectively guarded to prevent employees from accessing the feed rolls while in operation.� a: The finish end of the carding machine. b: Operator's access area of the carding machine.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4516.4
- — Z (S) $6452
1904.41 A02
- Issued
- Jul 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $922 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.41(a)(2):The employer did not electronically submit information from OSHA Form 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illness to OSHA or OSHA's designee when their establishment had 20 or more employees but fewer than 250 employees at any time during the previous calendar year, and their establishment was classified in an industry listed in appendix A to subpart E of this part: FY Holdings Corp - The employer failed to electronically submit information from their OSHA Form 300A or equivalent for calendar year 2023 by March 2, 2024. The establishment employed 23 employees and is classified as industry NAICS 313110 during the calendar year 2023.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $922
More inspections at FY Holdings Corp
View FY Holdings Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 313110)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347466369.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.