Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TELOS RESOURCE GROUP, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TELOS RESOURCE GROUP, LLC. in 797 AUGUSTA ROAD, WINSLOW, ME 04901 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 347469231.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Telos Resource Group, LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Telos Resource Group, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
797 AUGUSTA ROAD
City
WINSLOW
State
ME
ZIP
04901
Mailing
797 AUGUSTA ROAD, WINSLOW, ME 04901
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2024
Abate by
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and/or a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing, or likely to cause, death or serious physical harm in that employees were exposed to crushed by hazards due to the unsafe operation of automotive lifts:  Shop -  Eagle Equipment auto lift, serial number 09070091, was operated unsafely and/or with defects in the following instances:  a) Lift was not inspected. b) Drivers side rear swing arm restraint was missing. The other three swing arm restraints were not properly functioning. c) Swing arm pads were missing on three of the four swing arm attachments. d) A hydraulic leak was seen near the main hydraulic line, from the pump to the lift components. e) Safety warning labels were covered with other safety stickers. f) The overhead travel limit switch was not operational. g) There were no documents available for employees to show where a vehicle should be lifted. h) Telescoping lift arm over travel stops were missing.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4839

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2024
Abate by
Aug 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) would be met:  Facility - The employer did not develop a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2074

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program was not established and implemented for employer required respirator use:  Facility - The employer allowed employees to wear respirators without an established and implemented written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2074

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Facility - The employer did not ensure employees had a medical evaluation before the use of respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph:  Facility - The employer did not ensure employees wearing tight fitting respirators were fit tested.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 347469231.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.