LYNNFIELD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: MSL GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MSL GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC in 800 LYNNFIELD ST., LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347476285.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MSL GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 800 LYNNFIELD ST.
- City
- LYNNFIELD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01940
- Mailing
- 24 FULLER ST., BROCKTON, MA 02301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. Location - Below the roof. On or about 5/13/2024, employees on the ground level were not protected from falling objects while working below other elevated employees.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Location - Roof On or about 5/13/2024, employees on a residential roof were not protected from falling to a lower level while working at heights greater than 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- May 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. Location - Roof On or about 5/13/2024, employees installing a new roof were not protected from potential falls to a lower level. The anchors used for personal fall arrest were not installed correctly.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347476285.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.