Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EGC CONSTRUCTION CORP

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of EGC CONSTRUCTION CORP in 8814 TRADE PORT DRIVE, HAMILTON, OH 45011 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347496770.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EGC Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EGC Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8814 TRADE PORT DRIVE
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45011
Mailing
30 W 4TH STREET, NEWPORT, KY 41071
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,372 · Current $7,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable: (I) Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; (ii) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; (iii) Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; (iv) Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; (v) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; (vi) Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators; (vii) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; (viii) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance;   a) On or about March 18, 2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC did not establish and implement an adequate written respiratory program with worksite-specific procedures for employees who were required to wear a 3M 8511 N95 Respirator to perform work including but not limited to indoor concrete cutting using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade and jackhammering the concrete. The written respirator program did not include adequate worksite-specific procedures for the selection and use of respirators, medical evaluations, fit test procedures, employee training, or procedures on how to clean the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7500
  • — Z (S) $10372

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): Medical evaluation. Using a respirator may place a physiological burden on employees that varies with the type of respirator worn, the job and workplace conditions in which the respirator is used, and the medical status of the employee. Accordingly, this paragraph specifies the minimum requirements for medical evaluation that employers must implement to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator. General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC did not provide a medical evaluation for the 3M 8511 N95 Respirator for employees performing work including but not limited to indoor concrete cutting using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade and while wet jackhammering was performed, which exposed employees to respirable crystalline silica. The employer required employees to wear the 3M 8511 N95 respirator during this work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Fit testing. This paragraph requires that, before an employee may be required to use any respirator with a negative or positive pressure tight-fitting facepiece, the employee must be fit tested with the same make, model, style, and size of respirator that will be used. This paragraph specifies the kinds of fit tests allowed, the procedures for conducting them, and how the results of the fit tests must be used. The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators such as the 3M 8511 N95 Respirator were fit tested prior to use and at least annually thereafter when exposed to contaminants including but not limited to respirable crystalline silica while using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade and wet jackhammering indoors, which exposed employees to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): Training and information. This paragraph requires the employer to provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators. The training must be comprehensive, understandable, and recur annually, and more often if necessary. This paragraph also requires the employer to provide the basic information on respirators in appendix D of this section to employees who wear respirators when not required by this section or by the employer to do so. The employer shall ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of at least the following: (i) Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; (ii) What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; (iii) How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; (iv) How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; (v) What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator; (vi) How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators; and (vii) The general requirements of this section.   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC did not ensure respirator training, which demonstrated knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through (vii) was provided for employees who were required by the employer to wear the3M 8511 N95 Respirator when performing work including but not limited to indoor concrete cutting using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade, which exposed employees to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(1): Respirable crystalline silica. Respiratory protection-General. Where respiratory protection is required by this section, the employer must provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complies with the requirements of this paragraph and 29 CFR 1910.134. Respiratory protection is required: (i) Where specified by Table 1 of paragraph (c) of this section;    a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC did not require the use of a respirator with an assigned protection factor (APF) of 10 for exposures to respirable crystalline silica, per 29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1)(ii) and (x) for employees who were operating a handheld concrete cutting saw using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade indoors and while wet jackhammering indoors was performed, which exposed employees to respirable crystalline silica. The employer provided a voluntary use respirator which had not been fit tested, the 3M 8511 N95 respirator and explained that it was not mandatory to wear it, and that they were not required by the standard to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,372 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment by a competent person designated by the employer in that the required plans, training, and personal protective equipment were not provided per 1926.1153, and respirator programs, medical evaluations, required respirators, and fit tests were not provided or were inadequate under 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10372

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $14,518 · Current $7,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): Specified exposure control methods. For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. Table 1 Specified Exposure Control Methods When Working With Materials Containing Crystalline Silica for Equipment/Task  (ii) Handheld power saws (any blade diameter) used indoors with an integrated water delivery system feeding water continuously to the blade which is used for less than 4 hours a respirator with an assigned protection factor (APF) of 10 is required at minimum. (x) Jackhammers and handheld powered chipping tools used indoors and use tool with water delivery system that supplies a continuous stream or spray of water at the point of impact    a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, EGC had employees operating a handheld concrete cutting saw using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade indoors and wet jackhammering concrete slab while indoors without fully and properly implementing the respiratory protection for respirable crystalline silica specified for the equipment and task in that no respirator was provided per the requirements of 1926.1153(c)(1)(ii) and (x) per Table 1 or assessed and limited in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7500
  • — Z (S) $14518

1926.1153 D02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section. (d)(2)(ii) Performance option. The employer shall assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of any combination of air monitoring data or objective data sufficient to accurately characterize employee exposures to respirable crystalline silica. (d)(2)(iii)(A) Scheduled monitoring option. The employer shall perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples that reflect the exposures of employees on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where several employees perform the same tasks on the same shift and in the same work area, the employer may sample a representative fraction of these employees in order to meet this requirement. In representative sampling, the employer shall sample the employee(s) who are expected to have the highest exposure to respirable crystalline silica.   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, the employer, EGC, did not assess the exposure of employees to respirable crystalline silica, who were operating a handheld concrete cutting saw using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade while indoors, who was jackhammering concrete slab while indoors, and when assessing a walk-behind concrete saw used indoors by using air monitoring data, objective data, or scheduled air monitoring.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Abate by
Sep 9, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,372 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): Respirable Crystalline Silica. Written exposure control plan. The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan that contains at least the following elements: (I) A description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica; (ii) A description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica for each task; (iii) A description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica; and (iv) A description of the procedures used to restrict access to work areas, when necessary, to minimize the number of employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica and their level of exposure, including exposures generated by other employers or sole proprietors.   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, the employer, EGC, did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan for respirable crystalline silica per CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)(i) through (iv) for an employee operating a handheld concrete cutting saw using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade while indoors and for an employee who was jackhammering concrete slab while indoors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10372

1926.1153 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,372 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(2)(i): Employee information and training. The employer shall ensure that each employee covered by this section can demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the following: (A) The health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica; (B) Specific tasks in the workplace that could result in exposure to respirable crystalline silica; (C) Specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica, including engineering controls, work practices, and respirators to be used; (D) The contents of this section; (E) The identity of the competent person designated by the employer in accordance with paragraph (g)(4) of this section;   a) On or about March 18,  2024, at Resilience US, Inc., 8814 Trade Port Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011 at fill 5, the employer, EGC, did not ensure that employees demonstrated knowledge and understanding of 1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(A) through (E) for the employing filling out the JHA Concrete Demolition on how the work was to be performed and for an employee operating a handheld concrete cutting saw using the Hilti DCH 300X electric cutter handheld wet saw with a 12-inch blade while indoors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10372

View EGC Construction Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347496770.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.