ARLINGTON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: FABIAN HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FABIAN HERNANDEZ in 203 ELLICKSON ST., ARLINGTON, WI 53911 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347502189.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FABIAN HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 203 ELLICKSON ST.
- City
- ARLINGTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53911
- Mailing
- 738 S GAMMON RD APT 3, MADISON, WI 53711
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 2.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Dec 16, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. The employer failed to submit documentation of abatement within 10 days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 1a, Citation 1 Item 1b, Citation 1 Item 1c, and Citation 1 Item 3.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.21 A
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(a): The employer did not establish and/or supervise programs for the education and/or training of employers and/or employees in the recognition, avoidance and prevention of unsafe conditions in employments covered by the act. On or about May 23, 2024, the employer failed to establish Safety and Health Management System Programs in which training on hazards associated with residential roofing was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) On or about May 23, 2024, employees engaged in shingle installation at heights greater than 6ft were not provided fall hazard recognition training. Employees were not provided the skills and knowledge necessary to mitigate, avoid, or eliminate fall hazards at the workplace.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. On or about May 23, 2024, the employer did not provide employees engaged in roofing activities with ladder safety training. A portable extension ladder was used to access the walking/working surface that was not placed 3ft above the upper landing surface exposing employees to a slip/trip/fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. On or about May 23, 2024, safety glasses were not provided to employees who used a pneumatic nailing machine to install shingles on a two-story single-family residential home. Employees were exposed to flying particles which could impair sight of their footing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2074
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about May 23, 2024, employees installed new shingles on a residential two-story roof with a 6/12 pitch at heights greater than 6ft approximately +10ft, without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $2,074
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about May 23, 2024, the portable extension ladder used to access the roof of a residential two-story single-family home was not raised 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2074
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347502189.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.