DOVER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. DBA MISF
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. DBA MISF in 31 WEBB PLACE, DOVER, NH 03820 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 347516544.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. DBA MISF
- Site address
- 31 WEBB PLACE
- City
- DOVER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03820
- Mailing
- 31 WEBB PLACE, DOVER, NH 03820
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Site- On or about May 7, 2024, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program where employees working at the site were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 24, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- On or about May 7, 2024, employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the worksite by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Site- On or about May 7, 2024, employees working from an aerial lift were not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Site- On or about May 7, 2024, employees working from an aerial lift were not protected from a fall hazard where fall protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the roof of the of the hotel were not protected from falls between approximately 25 feet where fall protection was not required to used by the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347516544.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.