Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. DBA MISF

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of MICROTEL INNS AND SUITES FRANCHISING, INC. DBA MISF in 31 WEBB PLACE, DOVER, NH 03820 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 347516544.

Watch Microtel Inns AND Suites Franchising, INC. DBA Misf — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Microtel Inns AND Suites Franchising, INC. DBA Misf is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
31 WEBB PLACE
City
DOVER
State
NH
ZIP
03820
Mailing
31 WEBB PLACE, DOVER, NH 03820
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2024
Abate by
Jul 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  Site- On or about May 7, 2024, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program where employees working at the site were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2024
Abate by
Jul 24, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   Site- On or about May 7, 2024, employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the worksite by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2024
Abate by
Jul 22, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   Site- On or about May 7, 2024, employees working from an aerial lift were not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:  Site- On or about May 7, 2024, employees working from an aerial lift were not protected from a fall hazard where fall protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.501 B13

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Site- Employees working from the roof of the of the hotel were not protected from falls between approximately 25 feet where fall protection was not required to used by the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347516544.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.