AMELIA, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ESMY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESMY CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 3684 HERITAGE FARM LANE, AMELIA, OH 45102 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347527954.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESMY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 3684 HERITAGE FARM LANE
- City
- AMELIA
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45102
- Mailing
- 1319 WOODLAWN AVENUE, MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Accident Prevention Responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. a) On June 3, 2024, the employer failed to ensure that adequate frequent and regular inspections of the job site were conducted. As a result, an employee performing framing work without a fall protection system was exposed to a fall hazard greater than 18'.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2024
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $2,420 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On June 3, 2024, the employer did not ensure that employees were utilizing a fall protection system while conducting framing work on a newly constructed residential structure. An employee was exposed to a fall height greater than 18'.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2419.5
- — Z (S) $4839
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347527954.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.