NEENAH, WI —
OSHA Inspection: HECTOR BARTISA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HECTOR BARTISA in 1116/1118 BREEZEWOOD LANE, NEENAH, WI 54956 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347531857.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HECTOR BARTISA
- Site address
- 1116/1118 BREEZEWOOD LANE
- City
- NEENAH
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54956
- Mailing
- 2442 VINLAND ROAD, OSHKOSH, WI 54901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,148 · Current $4,148
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On or about June 6, 2024, at an establishment located at 1116/1118 Breezewood Lane in Neenah, Wisconsin, employees of Hector Batisa were performing residential roofing activities with no form of conventional fall protection while exposed to fall hazards of over 9 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4148
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15):Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows: On or about June 6, 2024, at an establishment located at 1116/1118 Breezewood Lane in Neenah, Wisconsin, employees of Hector Batisa were performing residential roofing activities and were not utilizing an anchor capable of supporting 5000lbs while exposed to fall hazards of over 9 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347531857.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.