Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COOLEY HOLDINGS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of COOLEY HOLDINGS, LLC in 24 CLEAR LANE, BLUE RIDGE, GA 30513 (NAICS 312112). OSHA activity number 347533465.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cooley Holdings, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cooley Holdings, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
24 CLEAR LANE
City
BLUE RIDGE
State
GA
ZIP
30513
Mailing
311 GREEN ST NW SUITE 500, GAINESVILLE, GA 30501
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
312112
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,687 · Current $2,212 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   a) Bottling line- On or about 06/06/24, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that, the employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program when employees were working with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, CA-400(corrosive), Ozone(respiratory hazards), and Perasan A (aka Proxy) (corrosive, oxidizer).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2212.2
  • — Z (S) $3687

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  a) Bottling line- On or about 06/06/24, and at times prior, employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that workplace hazard assessment was provided through a written certification for the hazards associated with sanitation operations while employees were working with chemicals such as but not limited to CA-400(corrosive), Ozone(respiratory hazards), and Perasan A (aka Proxy) (corrosive, oxidizer).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(2)(i): When the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible, the employer did not provide the respirator users with the information in Appendix D of this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirator When Not Required Under the Standard"):  a) Bottling line - On or about 06/06/2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that employees were provide with the safety information contained in Appendix D  of respiratory protection program prior to initial use of respirators when employees were using 3M Half-mask respirators voluntarily while working with chemicals such as CA-400(corrosive), and Perasan A (aka Proxy) (corrosive, oxidizer).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Bottling line - On or about 06/06/2024 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that employees were medically evaluated prior to initial use of respirators when employees were using 3M Half-mask respirators voluntarily while working with chemicals such as CA-400(corrosive), and Perasan A (aka Proxy) (corrosive, oxidizer).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347533465.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.